IN THE FIELD Overview Field Notes
Field Note 09 / Chapter 19 / Exhibit 19A + 19B

Adoption Threshold Diagnosis

Locate where movement is actually dying before funding an intervention aimed at a different stage.

Field Note 09 / EQ / Adoption

Adoption Threshold Diagnosis

Locate where movement is actually dying before funding an intervention aimed at a different stage.

Redline worked exampleChapter 19 / Exhibit 19A + 19BSame structure / different evidence

Attention

Strong. The cluster already knows Redline and often carries its proof language.

Meaning

Strong around the house; weak around the current offer. People know what Redline means and cannot place why legacy membership belongs in their life.

Trust

Strong around authentication and standards; weak around access terms, guest logic, and whether Dayline would remain different from VIP tourism after launch.

Action

Primary break. The person must accept an identity and commitment structure they reject before receiving the utility they value.

Sustained adoption

Unknown. No Dayline pathway exists yet. The organization has been using absence of behavior as proof of absence of demand.

Borrowed versus structural amplification

  • Celebrity partnership and broad paid reach: borrowed energy.
  • Proof-desk citation, member recommendation, and organic “hard to fake” language: structural seed.

Decision architecture note

First action must be reversible, proof-led, and legible without promoter interpretation. Dayline cannot begin with annual membership or a launch event requiring the customer to perform the rejected identity.

Falsifier

If a low-friction, proof-led trial fails at attention or meaning rather than action, the diagnosis must move upstream.

Decision movement

Awareness spend is frozen for the pilot cluster until action conditions and proof are designed.

Cumulative Field Read update

  • Adoption break located at action.
  • Borrowed and structural energy separated.
  • First-action design constraint entered.
Back to Field Notes
Field Note 09 / EQ / Adoption

Adoption Threshold Diagnosis

Locate where movement is actually dying before funding an intervention aimed at a different stage.

Blank companionChapter 19 / Exhibit 19A + 19BSame structure / different evidence
What must become true, what evidence exists, and how can the path die here?
What does the offer become to the person?
What promise, source, mechanism, or proof remains unstable?
What identity, effort, price, timing, or pathway friction blocks movement?
What must continue after novelty and promotion fade?
Is current amplification borrowed, structural, or mixed?
What would have to become true for action to feel sane?
What result would move the diagnosis to another threshold?
Which intervention stops or changes?
Record the threshold diagnosis.
Back to Field Notes Saved locally