The visible output is not the full work being priced
A “simple” deliverable can contain discovery, senior judgment, coordination, revisions, production, QA, and risk.
What are we promising?
Deliverables, assumptions, exclusions, rounds, dependencies.
How will payment work?
T&M, fixed, project, retainer, performance.
Why this price?
Outcome, expertise, urgency, uncertainty, accountability.
Which price is correct?
The same strategy assignment can be sold under different conditions.
120 estimated hours
Blended rate
Price = time × rate
Scope and unknowns defined
Risk allocation explicit
Value and urgency considered
Change rules visible
Build the commercial structure in order
The fee model should follow the work and uncertainty.
Commercial models distribute uncertainty differently
No structure is automatically client-friendly or agency-friendly.
Client carries volume risk
Useful when scope is genuinely uncertain.
Agency carries delivery risk
Requires assumptions and change control.
Both fund continuity and access
Requires capacity and priority rules.
Agency shares outcome risk
Requires measurable causality and control.
Price the same assignment three ways
A client wants a new go-to-market strategy in six weeks.
What is the client actually buying?
Defend the price without apologizing for expertise or pretending hours do not matter.
One assignment, three defensible models
The right structure depends on conditions.
Scope protects the promise. Pricing allocates the risk.
Professional-service value includes output, experience, judgment, speed, and consequence.